Skip to main content

Доклад Роберта Мюллера Book

TittleDownload Free Доклад Роберта МюллераOnline BookTemplate

Get Download Доклад Роберта Мюллера Online Book

ByTodd Elliott Koger

Доклад Роберта Мюллера

Total Download

29

“All good books have one thing in common – they are truer than if they had really happened.” -Ernest Hemingway

Synopsis

The old Watergate expression, |It's not the crime, it's the cover-up.| If |Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was widespread and included attempts to divide Americans by race to manipulate U.S. politics (Russian government's Internet Research Agency, based in St. Petersburg using troll farms to urge African Americans to boycott the election),| why did as few as 50,000 votes in just three states where I focused my |one-man| boycott activities decided the election? Maybe it is just a remarkable concurrence of events. (1) Serendipity that in North and West Philadelphia (Eastern Pennsylvania) where many of my emails were focused and Penn Hills (Western Pennsylvania) where I have a capable supporter and most of my |boots on the ground activity every election, that turnout fell 10 percent in theses majority-black wards. (2) The happenstance that in Milwaukee, Wisconsin District 15 turnout was down 19.5% were Donald J. Trump used verbatim pretty much all of the language of my writings for his first speech |asking for the black vote.| (3) And a |fluke| in Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan where 75,000 |Motown| voters decided to stay home. Not only did I have a social media presence established with Wayne County, Mr. Trump again used almost verbatim all of my |talking points| I shared for his visit to Great Faith Ministries. Take a moment and think about things. The Oxford University and Graphika report(s) attempt to suggest Russian activity was widespread all over the country. As I stated already, the margin of Mr. Trump's victory was only realized in the states where my activity was directly connected. Does this better explain why the |Mueller's investigation| appears to have shifted away from |collusion| and is now centered on WikiLeaks, DNC emails, Roger Stone? This catastrophic political mess, like |Watergate,| seems to be nothing more than stupidity again, at the highest level of American government. Congressional hearings, hundreds of pages of transcripts, sworn testimony, documentary evidence such as emails and text messages. After Hillary Clinton's defeat in 2016 the Democrats immediately attempted to |explain away| any possible correlation between the African American vote and Donald Trump's victory. Embarrassed that the black community |stayed home| rather than voting they unleashed their |talking heads| to discount any |organized| strategy by the Trump campaign that could have predicted things in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. And, the liberal press had copies of my information detailing how my |one-man| operation had put in place a |message| in simple language that the black electorate could understand. So, it appears Mr. Trump is correct |Russian interference| became the preferred |fake news| narrative. With the Democratic Party and the liberal media convincing the African American electorate that |Everything Donald Trump is bad| those who participated in the |organized boycott| of Hillary Clinton became too ashamed to acknowledge |They helped Trump win.| This created a vacuum that Stephen Bannon, Rick Santorum, and the likes filled - |If the black electorate didn't want to take credit for the victory an extreme racist white electorate would.| In short, our country is no longer the envy of the world. News reporting today is divided along the demographics of our politics. Entertainment, theater, and social dialogue have become no more than propaganda. Biased based or misleading information used to promote or publicize a particular cause or point of view previously only happened in other parts of the world. And with |grown-ups| no longer in the room, a |tit-for-tac pissing contest| is now what the world sees as American Democracy. Donald J. Trump could have possibly become a |good| president. But he wasn't given a chance. The |best and the brightest| were kept away from being able to help the man. And this is the problem |motif| of Democratic Party politics in urban America.

Comments